Islamic Archives

Home » Matthew 28:19-The Great Commission

Category Archives: Matthew 28:19-The Great Commission

Matthew 28:19 vs. Luke 9:26….Are Angels part of the Trinity too?

Luke 9:26 New International Version (NIV)

26 Whoever is ashamed of me and my words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of them when he comes in his glory and in the glory of the Father and of the holy angels.

Did the Disciples disobey Jesus Christ? (Matthew 28: 19 vs Acts)

The following post will compare the apparent ORDER of Jesus to his disciples in Matthew 28:19 and the subsequent DISOBEDIENCE of his disciples in regards to the “Baptismal Formula” within the Book of Acts.

At the end of this post, the reader will have no choice but to agree that either the disciples disobeyed Jesus OR that the verse of Matthew 28:19 is a fabrication/addition to the text of the Bible.

Now let us compare:


Early Church Fathers and Writings that Differed On Matthew 28:19

Taken from Here:


Matt. 28:19 – NIV, NAB – in Recognitions of Clement II

In the first place, I shall answer your assertion, that I set forth the words of my Master, and from them resolve matters about which there is still doubt. Our Lord, when He sent us apostles to preach, enjoined us to teach all nations[29]

Matt. 28:19 – NIV, NAB – in Clementine Homily XVII

“Knowing therefore that we knew all that was spoken by Him, and that we could supply the proofs, He sent us to the ignorant Gentiles to baptize them for remission of sins, and commanded us to teach them first.[16]

Matt. 28:19 – NIV, NAB – in Origen Commentary on Matthew Book X

And the Apostles on this account left Israel and did that which had been enjoined on them by the Saviour, “Make disciples of all the nations,”[123]


Taken from here:

“in my name.” We have translated the text according to the evidence we have that there were early Greek texts that read that way, and also according to what the Apostles did in Acts. They made disciples in the name of Jesus. We admit that there is no extant Greek text that says “go and make disciples of all the nations in my name,” they all read “baptizing them in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the holy spirit.” Nevertheless, we believe that the historical evidence, as well as the evidence in the Bible itself, supports the conclusion that the common rendering is a very early addition to the text, and the original reading was “in my name.” We give the following evidence to support our conclusion:


The Fabrication of Matthew 28:19

Matthew 28:19Go you therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

Doctrine and Practice in the Early Church:
By Dr. Stuart G. Hall 1992, pages 20 and 21. Professor Stuart G. Hall was the former Chair of Ecclesiastical History at King’s College, London England. Dr. Hall makes the factual statement that Catholic Trinitarian Baptism was not the original form of Christian Baptism, rather the original was Jesus name baptism. “In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,” although those words were not used, as they later are, as a formula. Not all baptisms fitted this rule.” Dr Hall further, states: “More common and perhaps more ancient was the simple, “In the name of the Lord Jesus or, Jesus Christ.” This practice was known among Marcionites and Orthodox; it is certainly the subject of controversy in Rome and Africa about 254, as the anonymous tract De rebaptismate (“On rebaptism”) shows.

Edmund Schlink, The Doctrine of Baptism, page 28:
The baptismal command in its Matthew 28:19 form cannot be the historical origin of Christian baptism. At the very least, it must be assumed that the text has been transmitted in a form expanded by the [Catholic] church.


%d bloggers like this: